• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
MENUMENU
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Philosophy
    • Choosing a Financial Planner
    • Legal and Regulatory
    • Team
    • Careers
    • Awards & Recognition
    • Contact Us
  • Our Services
    • Financial Planning
    • Ongoing Financial Guidance
    • Portfolio Management
  • Financial Planning Basics
    • Continuing Care Retirement Communities (CCRCs)
    • Retirement Planning and Cash Flow
    • Social Security
    • Taxes
    • Insurance & Risk Management
    • Investments
    • 401(k)
    • Real Estate
    • College
    • Liquidity
    • Divorce
    • Estate Planning
    • Sensible Updates
  • Resources
    • Blog
    • Financial Planning for Older Adults
    • Webinars
    • Videos
    • Financial Planning Guidebook
    • Continuing Care Retirement Communities Guidebook
    • Primers
    • Financial Planning Links
    • Client Login
  • Contact Us
Sensible Financial Planning

Sensible Financial Planning

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
Client Login

Call Us Today
781-642-0890

The Other One Percent – Part 3 (The Value of Waiting)

by
Frank Napolitano
J.D., CFP®, CFA® Charterholder - Senior Financial Advisor

March 29, 2016

This Part 3, of a 3-part series, read the other parts here: Part 1, Part 2.

In my previous two articles, I talked about both the relatively small number of Americans who delay receiving Social Security until age 70 (the age that would maximize their benefit), here, and how a breakeven analysis of Social Security is the wrong way to think about Social Security, here.

In this article, I want to quantify the benefit of delaying Social Security. Put another way, I want to answer the question: What would I have to get in the stock market to beat the 8% per year Social Security would give me to wait an extra year before filing for benefits?

To answer this question, let’s use a simple example. Suppose that Danielle turns 67 tomorrow and would be entitled to a $2,500 monthly Social Security benefit ($30,000 per year) if she filed for benefits. If she waits until next year to file, her benefit would be 8% higher, or $2,700 per month ($32,400 per year). To summarize:

Option 1 File for Social Security today and receive $30,000 per year for life.

Option 2 Receive $0 this year and file next year, receiving $32,400 every year for life.

Let’s further assume that Danielle has retirement savings. She can choose to fund $30,000 of spending this year from either Social Security or her IRA. If she takes her benefit today (Option 1), she can keep the $30,000 in her IRA invested in the market with the potential for growth. If she delays Social Security for one year (Option 2), she will have to withdraw $30,000 from her IRA and use that amount for living expenses. (For my analysis I am ignoring the fact that Social Security benefits are taxed differently from IRA withdrawals). We can rewrite her choices as:

Option 1 Take Social Security today and leave $30,000 invested in IRA for an additional year.

Option 2 Withdraw and spend $30,000 from IRA today and file for Social Security in a year.

To decide which option is better, we need to compare apples to apples, or, in this case, an annuity to another annuity. The benefit of delaying Social Security (Option 2) is easy to quantify: by waiting one year, Danielle will receive an 8% larger benefit for life. We can think about this as buying an annuity from Social Security. By giving up one year of benefits, or $30,000, Danielle can buy an annuity next year that will pay her $2,400 per year for life (that’s in addition to her $30,000 base benefit).

To make Option 1 comparable, we have to value the potential benefit in terms of an annuity. Remember that under Option 1, Danielle chooses to take her Social Security benefit immediately. This allows her to leave the $30,000 in her IRA she would have otherwise spent. Accordingly, Danielle benefits from investing her money in the stock market and, in one year, buying an annuity from an insurance company that provides her with $2,400 per year for the rest of her life. How much would this annuity cost?

I requested a blind quote from AIG insurance company for a 68-year-old female (Danielle’s age one year from now) and an annual, inflation-adjusted benefit of $2,400. (The inflation rider is necessary in order to make a valid comparison to Social Security, whose benefit increases every year with CPI). The cost of such an annuity today is $46,744.

Now we can compare Danielle’s options. She can either take Social Security today and buy a $2,400 annual inflation-adjusted annuity from an insurance company with her IRA savings or she can delay Social Security for one year and buy that same annuity from Social Security. Under Option 1, she pays $46,744 one year from now to an insurance company to buy the annuity. Under Option 2, she gives up $30,000 of Social Security benefits today to buy the annuity from the government. Under either scenario, beginning next year she will have $32,400 in annual, inflation-adjusted income:

Social Security income over time chart

So to duplicate the 8% higher benefit she would receive from Social Security, Danielle would have to grow the $30,000 in her IRA to $46,744 in one year. If that sounds like a lot, it is. According to my math, Danielle’s IRA would have to grow 55.8% in order for her just to break even (!).

So, what should Danielle do? The answer seems pretty clear. Social Security’s 8% benefit increase is a very good deal. Nothing available in the marketplace comes close.

Importantly, this is just an example. Delaying Social Security is not appropriate for everyone. The above strategy would not work for someone who does not have sufficient savings and needs the income from Social Security right away. It might not be appropriate for someone with a short life expectancy or someone who already has a large amount of guaranteed retirement income and perhaps wants to preserve more assets for her heirs.

Nevertheless, for those people who are stuck deciding between delaying Social Security and taking it sooner, it’s worth comparing apples to apples, or annuities to annuities.

More articles by Frank Napolitano Filed Under: Financial Planning Basics Tagged With: Social Security

Primary Sidebar

Sign up for our newsletter

Recent Posts

The picture shows a college campus and students because the article is about FAFSA.

The FAFSA Simplification Act and Financial Aid

The FAFSA Simplification Act makes adjustments to the FAFSA. How will it affect your college student and their financial aid?

The picture shows an older couple hiking on a beautiful day to represent retirement and the SECURE Act.

The SECURE Act 2.0 and Retirement

The SECURE Act 2.0 builds on the initial SECURE Act of 2019, changing the retirement planning space, and increasing retirement flexibility.

Categories

  • College Planning
  • Cybersecurity
  • Estate Planning
  • Financial Planning Basics
  • Financial Planning Videos
  • Insurance & Risk Management
  • Investments
  • Retirement Planning and Cash Flow
  • Sensible Updates

Topics

401(k) Annuities bond returns Bonds Charitable Giving College Planning Company Updates Credit Health Disability Insurance diversification Divorce Donor Advised Funds Economy estate planning Federal Reserve Financial Goals Financial IQ financial planning Financial Strategy Forbes.com housing inflation Investments Investment Strategy IRA Legislation Liquidity Long-Term Care Medicare Mortgage Older Adult Living Recommended Books remote work Retirement Choices retirement planning Retirement Savings Risk Management Securities Social Security Social Security benefits Staff News Stock Market Stocks sustainable portfolios taxes

authors

Rick Miller
Sensible Staff
Frank Napolitano
Rick Fine
Josh Trubow
Chris Andrysiak
Marie St. Clare
Laura Williams
Gyb Spilsbury
Chuck Luce
Aimee Plouffe Polley

Footer

Services

  • Financial Planning
  • Financial Guidance
  • Portfolio Management

About Us

  • Our Philosophy
  • Team

Resources

  • Blog
  • Financial Planning Guidebook
Sign up for our Newsletter
Awards & Recognition

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Locations

Massachusetts

203 Crescent Street, Suite 404

Waltham, MA 02453

Phone: (781) 642-0890
Fax: (781) 810-4830

 

California

600 B Street, Suite 300

San Diego, CA 92101

Phone: (619) 573-4131​

Disclaimer

This content reflects the opinions of Sensible Financial®. We may change it at any time without notice. We provide this content for informational purposes only. Although we endeavor to keep the information up-to-date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability for a particular purpose or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. We do not intend the information contained in this website as investment advice and we do not recommend that you buy or sell any security. We do not guarantee that our statements, opinions or forecasts will prove to be correct. Past performance does not guarantee future results. You cannot invest directly in any index. If you attempt to mimic the performance of an index, you will incur fees and expenses which will reduce returns. All investing involves risk. You can lose any money you invest. There is no guarantee that any investment plan or strategy will succeed.

More important additional information and full disclaimer.

Copyright © 2023 Sensible Financial · All Rights Are Reserved
Legal Disclosure