• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
MENUMENU
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Philosophy
    • Choosing a Financial Planner
    • Legal and Regulatory
    • Team
    • Careers
    • Awards & Recognition
    • Contact Us
  • Our Services
    • Financial Planning
    • Ongoing Financial Guidance
    • Portfolio Management
  • Financial Planning Basics
    • Continuing Care Retirement Communities (CCRCs)
    • Retirement Planning and Cash Flow
    • Social Security
    • Taxes
    • Insurance & Risk Management
    • Investments
    • 401(k)
    • Real Estate
    • College
    • Liquidity
    • Divorce
    • Estate Planning
    • Sensible Updates
  • Resources
    • Blog
    • Financial Planning for Older Adults
    • Webinars
    • Videos
    • Financial Planning Guidebook
    • Continuing Care Retirement Communities Guidebook
    • Primers
    • Financial Planning Links
    • Client Login
  • Contact Us
Sensible Financial Planning

Sensible Financial Planning

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
Client Login

Call Us Today
781-642-0890

Market Impact, Dark Pools, Payment for Order Flow, and You

by
Chris Andrysiak
MBA, CFP® - Senior Financial Advisor and Senior Director of Strategy

February 25, 2021

The picture is of a dark pool, a consequence of market impact.
Photo by Jack B on Unsplash

This is part one of a two-part article. 

You may have seen “market impact”, “payment for order flow”, and “dark pools” in the news lately. This article is intended to provide a high-level explanation of them, and how they might affect you. 

The investment markets are complex. There are thousands of smart, motivated individuals and companies looking for an edge, and there are frequent innovations and new developments. Some of the changes are very technical and are hard to understand if one is not closely involved. These three phrases are examples of those types of developments. 

Market Impact

Portfolio managers at large institutions like mutual funds or pension funds worry about “market impact” – a change in a stock’s price that occurs while, and as a result of the manager buying or selling it. For instance, if the manager of a large, actively managed mutual fund decides to add a stock to their portfolio, the fund may need to buy hundreds of thousands or even millions of shares. Such a large order will typically drive the price up for that stock (basic supply and demand). Other market participants would notice that large order, expect the stock to rise, and enter smaller orders to buy the stock. Those smaller orders could be filled (completed) more readily than the very large one. Those “follow on” buyers would get their stock first, at a lower price, and then benefit as the price went up due to the large order. Shareholders of the large institutional manager’s fund would be harmed because fund managers would be buying shares at a higher price than they expected to pay. 

To avoid this problem, institutional managers have long broken their orders into smaller “pieces”, entered over days and weeks, hoping that other market participants would not notice. But for the largest funds, this can be difficult because they must buy so many shares. It limits their nimbleness to react quickly to market news and can negatively impact their returns.

Dark pools emerge to allay market impact

To address this problem, so-called “dark pools” have arisen. These are private trading venues where the amount of buy or sell orders “in queue” are not as public as they are on the traditional exchanges like the New York Stock Exchange. This anonymity helps the large managers avoid the costs of market impact. Though we think of the “stock market” as being one big entity, it is fragmented into dozens of trading venues, including many exchanges and dark pools.

These trading venues need trading volume, or “liquidity” to fill the orders for the large managers. For instance, if a large manager wants to buy 500,000 shares of a stock on a particular trading venue, the venue needs sell orders for 500,000 shares to match. That doesn’t need to be a single order to sell 500,000 shares; it could be 500 orders to sell 1,000 shares each, or even 5,000 orders to sell 100 shares each. 

Payment for order flow

This is where payment for order flow comes into play. The private trading venues will pay brokerage firms to route their orders to them, rather than to an exchange or another trading venue. The brokerage firms keep this payment for order flow as revenue. For example, Trading Venue A will pay Brokerage Firm B to send certain orders to Venue A, rather than to another trading venue. This is revenue for Brokerage Firm B.

The practice is controversial. Critics claim the brokerage firm should be routing its orders to the venue that offers the best prices, not the venue that pays the brokerage firm the most for its order flow. In essence, the brokerage firm is benefiting from the payment for order flow, and its customers are potentially being hurt by paying prices that are not as good as are available elsewhere.

On the other hand, brokerage firms need revenue to cover their costs. Payment for order flow is one of the factors that has allowed trading commissions to fall so dramatically to $0 in many cases. The brokers are getting their revenue elsewhere, such as from payment for order flow. $0 trades are one of the factors that has attracted small active traders to the market, of the sort that drove the recent GameStop event. However, those $0 trades may not be as free as they seem to be. 

Not all brokerage firms accept payment for order flow, due to its controversial nature. Sensible Financial offers a selection of brokerage firms. Some accept payment for order flow and others do not.

It is difficult to know with certainty how much (if at all) individual investors are being harmed by the practice of payment for order flow. Not all the data is public, and to analyze it properly, the timing of trades must be analyzed, down to the millisecond. However, there is academic research on the subject. One paper we read noted that investors unable to negotiate commission rates with brokers pay more for stocks and receive less when they sell. The difference is approximately the amount the brokerage firm collects in payment for order flow. 

What does this all mean for you and your portfolio? I will discuss that in my article next month. In the meantime, if you have any questions, please contact your advisor. 

Here is the link to part two.

More articles by Chris Andrysiak Filed Under: Investments Tagged With: dark pools, Investments, market impact, payment for order flow

Primary Sidebar

Sign up for our newsletter

Recent Posts

The picture shows a college campus and students because the article is about FAFSA.

The FAFSA Simplification Act and Financial Aid

The FAFSA Simplification Act makes adjustments to the FAFSA. How will it affect your college student and their financial aid?

The picture shows an older couple hiking on a beautiful day to represent retirement and the SECURE Act.

The SECURE Act 2.0 and Retirement

The SECURE Act 2.0 builds on the initial SECURE Act of 2019, changing the retirement planning space, and increasing retirement flexibility.

Categories

  • College Planning
  • Cybersecurity
  • Estate Planning
  • Financial Planning Basics
  • Financial Planning Videos
  • Insurance & Risk Management
  • Investments
  • Retirement Planning and Cash Flow
  • Sensible Updates

Topics

401(k) Annuities bond returns Bonds Charitable Giving College Planning Company Updates Credit Health Disability Insurance diversification Divorce Donor Advised Funds Economy estate planning Federal Reserve Financial Goals Financial IQ financial planning Financial Strategy Forbes.com housing inflation Investments Investment Strategy IRA Legislation Liquidity Long-Term Care Medicare Mortgage Older Adult Living Recommended Books remote work Retirement Choices retirement planning Retirement Savings Risk Management Securities Social Security Social Security benefits Staff News Stock Market Stocks sustainable portfolios taxes

authors

Rick Miller
Sensible Staff
Frank Napolitano
Rick Fine
Josh Trubow
Chris Andrysiak
Marie St. Clare
Laura Williams
Gyb Spilsbury
Chuck Luce
Aimee Plouffe Polley

Footer

Services

  • Financial Planning
  • Financial Guidance
  • Portfolio Management

About Us

  • Our Philosophy
  • Team

Resources

  • Blog
  • Financial Planning Guidebook
Sign up for our Newsletter
Awards & Recognition

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Locations

Massachusetts

203 Crescent Street, Suite 404

Waltham, MA 02453

Phone: (781) 642-0890
Fax: (781) 810-4830

 

California

600 B Street, Suite 300

San Diego, CA 92101

Phone: (619) 573-4131​

Disclaimer

This content reflects the opinions of Sensible Financial®. We may change it at any time without notice. We provide this content for informational purposes only. Although we endeavor to keep the information up-to-date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability for a particular purpose or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. We do not intend the information contained in this website as investment advice and we do not recommend that you buy or sell any security. We do not guarantee that our statements, opinions or forecasts will prove to be correct. Past performance does not guarantee future results. You cannot invest directly in any index. If you attempt to mimic the performance of an index, you will incur fees and expenses which will reduce returns. All investing involves risk. You can lose any money you invest. There is no guarantee that any investment plan or strategy will succeed.

More important additional information and full disclaimer.

Copyright © 2023 Sensible Financial · All Rights Are Reserved
Legal Disclosure