• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
MENUMENU
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Philosophy
    • Choosing a Financial Planner
    • Legal and Regulatory
    • Team
    • Careers
    • Awards & Recognition
    • Contact Us
  • Our Services
    • Financial Planning
    • Ongoing Financial Guidance
    • Portfolio Management
  • Financial Planning Basics
    • Continuing Care Retirement Communities (CCRCs)
    • Retirement Planning and Cash Flow
    • Social Security
    • Taxes
    • Insurance & Risk Management
    • Investments
    • 401(k)
    • Real Estate
    • College
    • Liquidity
    • Divorce
    • Estate Planning
    • Sensible Updates
  • Resources
    • Blog
    • Financial Planning for Older Adults
    • Webinars
    • Videos
    • Financial Planning Guidebook
    • Continuing Care Retirement Communities Guidebook
    • Primers
    • Financial Planning Links
    • Client Login
  • Contact Us
Sensible Financial Planning

Sensible Financial Planning

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
Client Login

Call Us Today
781-642-0890

How Much Can I Plan on Social Security?

by
Sensible Staff
November 17, 2017

In my first article on Social Security, I described how the program works and reviewed the program’s financial standing over the last thirty years. In my second article, I examined the financial future of Social Security and the policy changes necessary to shore up the program’s long-term finances. Here, I outline Sensible Financial’s new projections regarding Social Security and describe how they affect the advice we give our clients. In what follows, I hope to provide you with a clearer sense of how Social Security may change in the future and what this means for your financial plan.

Social Security’s coming insolvency

At first glance, the Social Security program appears to be running quite smoothly. Program receipts have been greater than expenditures for the last thirty years and benefits continue to be paid as promised. However, the Trustees of the Social Security trust fund (“Trustees”) predict program expenditures will surpass receipts by 2022 and the program will be unable to fully cover benefit payments by 2034. If Social Security taxes are to fund benefits over the next 75 years, the program needs to come up with $12.5 trillion. That’s nearly 1% of the country’s projected GDP over that time! To do so, Congress will need to reform Social Security by increasing taxes, reducing benefits, or both.

History may be a guide to future reforms

Historically, major Congressional amendments to Social Security have 1) occurred only when short-term insolvency of the program was imminent, 2) employed a balance of cost cutting and revenue generating measures, and 3) aimed to restore the program’s financial solvency over a period of about 50 years. The 1977 and 1983 amendments to Social Security are two examples.[1]

In their 1975 report to Congress, the Trustees forecast depletion of the Social Security trust fund by 1979. This was just 44 years after the program was originally created. At the time, a poor economy, the demographics of the baby boom, and legislation in 1972 that generously increased benefits all contributed to the program’s funding issue. In response, Congress passed amendments in 1977 to restore the long-term solvency of the program. The amendments raised the Social Security payroll tax rate, increased the wage base, and reduced benefits slightly.

Although these fixes restored the long-term balance of the program, higher than expected inflation (which increased benefit payments) and lower than expected wages (which lowered payroll tax receipts) produced severe short-term financing problems—so much so that the program was forecast to be unable to fully cover benefit payments by 1983. In response, Congress passed last-minute amendments in 1983 to restore the short-term solvency of the program. The amendments legislated the taxation of benefits and put in place a gradual increase in the full retirement age.

Today the program is heading towards insolvency again. By 2034 the Trustees project that the program will be unable to fully cover its benefit payments. This means that Congress will need to pass legislation no later than 2034 to keep the program financially solvent. Unsurprisingly, 2034 marks the 51st year since the 1983 Amendments!

Expect Congress to procrastinate

Unfortunately, Congress has little incentive to implement major legislative reforms to shore up the program’s long-term finances, let alone to make the program financially stable indefinitely. Congress hates to raise taxes and cut benefits, as both are unpopular with voters. History illustrates that Congress prefers to put these actions off as long as possible. When action is taken, it is much easier and less expensive for Congress to temporarily fund the program than to make it financially solvent indefinitely.[2] If history repeats, when Congress does implement reform, it is likely to shore up the program’s finances for about 50 years, as it did when the program first started and again in 1977/1983.

Plan for a reduction in benefits and an increase in taxes

Around 2034, when trust fund assets are forecast for depletion, we assume Congress will enact legislation that balances tax increases and benefit reductions sufficiently to fund the program for the following 50 years.[3] Based on projections by the Trustees, such legislation would entail a permanent increase of about 2 percentage points in the Social Security payroll tax rate (from its current rate of 12.4% to 14.4%) and a permanent decrease of about 11.5% in scheduled benefits for all current and future beneficiaries.[4] [5]

What do these projections mean for you and your financial plan? The answer depends on your age. The closer you are to filing for Social Security retirement benefits, the smaller the impact these projections will have on your living standard (i.e., how much you can afford to spend each year on day-to-day living expenses).[6] Because we expect Congress to delay passing legislation until the trust fund nears depletion in 2034, younger people are likely to experience a larger impact. For instance, under our projections, a 60-year-old will not experience an increase in payroll taxes before retirement and will not experience a Social Security benefit reduction until several years after receiving their first benefit check (see Figure 1). On the other hand, a 40-year-old would experience both an increase in payroll taxes before retirement and a reduced Social Security benefit for every year in retirement (see Figure 2). (The specific numbers shown for benefits and taxes in the figures below are those projected for an individual earning $200k a year in inflation-adjusted dollars over their career.)

Figure 1. Under our projections, a 60-year-old would see an 11.5% Social Security benefit decrease in 2034, but no change in payroll taxes.

can i plan on social security

Figure 2. Under our projections, a 40-year-old would see an 11.5% Social Security benefit decrease in retirement and a payroll tax increase in 2034.[7]

can i plan on social security

Planning for future changes to Social Security means planning for lower lifetime after-tax income. All else equal, this means less spending starting now and more saving until retirement.

Our projections translate to a reduction in lifetime Social Security benefits and an increase in lifetime Social Security taxes (see red shaded areas in above figures). Together, this means less lifetime after-tax income: your annual living standard from now through the end of retirement is likely to be from $1,500 to $4,000 lower than it would be if the Social Security program could keep its promises. Younger and higher earning individuals will see a decline at the upper end of the range, while older and lower earning individuals will see a decline at the lower end. Households with more than one adult will also see a larger decline.[8]

Conclusion

The Social Security program requires serious reform. Without it, the program will be unable to fully pay benefits beginning in 2034. History suggests that Congress will act to reform Social Security temporarily by enacting a balance of tax increases and benefit reductions only when the program’s short-term insolvency is imminent. In the past, for financial planning clients, Sensible Financial assumed that Social Security benefits would decline by about 20% around 2033. This was based on projections by the Board of Trustees (at the time) that when trust fund assets were depleted payroll taxes would cover only about 80% of all scheduled benefits.

For new and ongoing financial planning clients, Sensible Financial is now updating our assumptions regarding Social Security. Based on analysis published by the Board of Trustees, Sensible Financial projects that the Social Security payroll tax rate will increase by about 2 percentage points from its current rate of 12.4% to 14.4% and benefits will decrease by about 11.5% (for all current and future beneficiaries) beginning in 2034.

We believe that accounting for realistic changes to Social Security is good planning. Depending on your age and earnings, our projections imply a reduction in your annual living standard between $1,500 to $4,000. This means you will have about $125 to $333 a month less (after-tax) to spend on your living standard, now through the end of retirement, than if you assumed there were no changes to Social Security. For households with more than one adult, this amount will be higher.

Prediction is difficult, especially about the future: A Disclaimer

When it comes to the economic assumptions we use in our client’s financial plans, such as those around Social Security, I must warn you against the illusion of precision. Although we strive to develop projections grounded in real-world data and credible research, we recognize that your actual experience is likely to be different. This is only natural, given the inherent uncertainty of the future. Ultimately, the process of planning for the future is more important than the accuracy of your plan. “Things will change, but with every decision you make, you’ll be a little less wrong.”[9]


To speak with an advisor about planning for your financial future, contact us!

 

[1] See https://www.ssa.gov/history/briefhistory3.html, https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/ssb/v66n1/v66n1p1.html, https://www.ssa.gov/history/notchfile3.html.
[2] In their 2017 Annual Report, the Trustees project that the Social Security program would need to borrow $34.2 trillion today to make the program financial stable indefinitely. This is estimated to be 4.2% of taxable payroll or 1.4% of GDP. This funding shortfall is $21.7 trillion larger than the $12.5 trillion shortfall projected over the next 75-year period. See https://www.ssa.gov/OACT/TR/2017/tr2017.pdf.
[3] This means that sometime around 2090 the program would again require significant reform to remain solvent. In this sense, by enacting legislation that does not fully fund the program indefinitely, Congress (as it historically has) is passing the cost of maintaining the program’s finances onto subsequent generations of Americans.
[4] This assumes that a 1% tax increase will generate exactly half as much revenue as a 2% increase, and a 1% reduction in benefits will save exactly twice as much in expenses as a 2% reduction.
[5] The payroll tax is equally split between employee and employer. For wage earners, this means the assumed increase in the Social Security payroll tax rate will be from 6.2% to 7.2% of taxable wages. For self-employed individuals, the assumed increase would be the full 2 percentage points, from 12.4% to 14.4% of taxable wages.
[6] We define your living standard as the amount of money you spend on consumption items such as food, transportation, entertainment, and travel. Our projections assume that your spending on taxes, housing and other committed (or goal-specific) expenses will not change.
[7] A 40-year-old will have a higher Social Security benefit than a 60-year-old, in real dollars, if the national average wage index (AWI) rises at a rate greater than inflation. This is because the AWI impacts both the taxable wage base and the bend points in the PIA benefits calculation. Historically, the AWI has risen at 3% above inflation.
[8] Although a household with more than one adult will see a greater decline in their living standard, the reduction will be muted because of the economies of shared living and that children are typically less expensive than adults. Research suggests that two adults living together can live as cheaply as 1.6 living separately and that a child living at home costs about 70% that of an adult. For example, if the reduction in living standard is $4,000 for a single adult, it may be about $2,500 for the next adult, $1,500 for the first child, and $1,000 for the next. This $9,000 reduction in the household’s living standard is considerably less than the $16,000 reduction that would occur if there were no economies of shared living and children were as expensive as adults.
[9] Carl Richards, “The Financial Plan is Dead: Long Live Financial Planning.” Morningstar, 2017. http://www.morningstar.com/advisor/t/118267201/the-financial-plan-is-dead.htm

More articles by Sensible Staff Filed Under: Financial Planning Basics Tagged With: Social Security

Primary Sidebar

Sign up for our newsletter

Recent Posts

The picture shows a college campus and students because the article is about FAFSA.

The FAFSA Simplification Act and Financial Aid

The FAFSA Simplification Act makes adjustments to the FAFSA. How will it affect your college student and their financial aid?

The picture shows an older couple hiking on a beautiful day to represent retirement and the SECURE Act.

The SECURE Act 2.0 and Retirement

The SECURE Act 2.0 builds on the initial SECURE Act of 2019, changing the retirement planning space, and increasing retirement flexibility.

Categories

  • College Planning
  • Cybersecurity
  • Estate Planning
  • Financial Planning Basics
  • Financial Planning Videos
  • Insurance & Risk Management
  • Investments
  • Retirement Planning and Cash Flow
  • Sensible Updates

Topics

401(k) Annuities bond returns Bonds Charitable Giving College Planning Company Updates Credit Health Disability Insurance diversification Divorce Donor Advised Funds Economy estate planning Federal Reserve Financial Goals Financial IQ financial planning Financial Strategy Forbes.com housing inflation Investments Investment Strategy IRA Legislation Liquidity Long-Term Care Medicare Mortgage Older Adult Living Recommended Books remote work Retirement Choices retirement planning Retirement Savings Risk Management Securities Social Security Social Security benefits Staff News Stock Market Stocks sustainable portfolios taxes

authors

Rick Miller
Sensible Staff
Frank Napolitano
Rick Fine
Josh Trubow
Chris Andrysiak
Marie St. Clare
Laura Williams
Gyb Spilsbury
Chuck Luce
Aimee Plouffe Polley

Footer

Services

  • Financial Planning
  • Financial Guidance
  • Portfolio Management

About Us

  • Our Philosophy
  • Team

Resources

  • Blog
  • Financial Planning Guidebook
Sign up for our Newsletter
Awards & Recognition

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Locations

Massachusetts

203 Crescent Street, Suite 404

Waltham, MA 02453

Phone: (781) 642-0890
Fax: (781) 810-4830

 

California

600 B Street, Suite 300

San Diego, CA 92101

Phone: (619) 573-4131​

Disclaimer

This content reflects the opinions of Sensible Financial®. We may change it at any time without notice. We provide this content for informational purposes only. Although we endeavor to keep the information up-to-date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability for a particular purpose or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. We do not intend the information contained in this website as investment advice and we do not recommend that you buy or sell any security. We do not guarantee that our statements, opinions or forecasts will prove to be correct. Past performance does not guarantee future results. You cannot invest directly in any index. If you attempt to mimic the performance of an index, you will incur fees and expenses which will reduce returns. All investing involves risk. You can lose any money you invest. There is no guarantee that any investment plan or strategy will succeed.

More important additional information and full disclaimer.

Copyright © 2023 Sensible Financial · All Rights Are Reserved
Legal Disclosure