• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
MENUMENU
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Philosophy
    • Choosing a Financial Planner
    • Legal and Regulatory
    • Team
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Our Services
    • Financial Planning
    • Ongoing Financial Guidance
    • Portfolio Management
  • Financial Planning Basics
    • Continuing Care Retirement Communities (CCRCs)
    • Retirement Planning and Cash Flow
    • Social Security
    • Taxes
    • Insurance & Risk Management
    • Investments
    • 401(k)
    • Real Estate
    • College
    • Liquidity
    • Divorce
    • Estate Planning
    • Sensible Updates
  • Resources
    • The Types of People We Help
    • Webinars
    • Blog
    • Videos
    • Financial Planning Guidebook
    • Continuing Care Retirement Communities Guidebook
    • Primers
    • Financial Planning Links
    • Client Links
    • Financial Planning for Older Adults
  • Contact Us
Sensible Financial Planning

Sensible Financial Planning

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
Client Links

Call Us Today
781-642-0890

Will Trump abolish the DOL fiduciary rule? Does it matter?

by
Frank Napolitano
J.D., CFP®, CFA® Charterholder - Senior Financial Advisor

February 23, 2017

Fiduciary RuleOnly a few months ago I wrote How the DOL’s New Fiduciary Rule Will Affect Retirement Advice. In doing so, I threw three years of law school education out the window and broke one of the profession’s cardinal rules: Never speak in absolutes! (As if “never” weren’t an absolute!). I’d like to take this opportunity to formally apologize to my legal writing professor.

I also want to talk about how the recent decision by the President to instruct the Department of Labor (DOL) to review the fiduciary rule might affect financial advice in the future.

A brief recap of the fiduciary rule

The DOL’s fiduciary rule requires that financial advisors who advise on retirement accounts must act as fiduciaries, i.e., they have a legal responsibility to act in their clients’ best interest. (Why only retirement accounts and not, say, brokerage accounts? The DOL is authorized to regulate retirement advice under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, which applies only to retirement accounts). Proponents of the rule argue that people expect retirement advisors to act in their best interest, much like doctors and lawyers do. Requiring such people to act as fiduciaries aligns expectations with reality.  The law should also make it harder for unscrupulous advisors to sell clients high-cost investments. Opponents counter that the law will increase business costs, which will be shifted to consumers in the form of higher fees. After an almost eight-year-long battle, it appeared that the yeas had it and the fiduciary rule was set to go into effect this April.

Oh the times they are a changin’… maybe

Last month, President Trump ordered a review of the law. (You can find the official White House memorandum here). In the review, he asks the DOL to (re-)review the fiduciary rule and if it finds that the rule will adversely affect investors or otherwise “not be consistent with the policies of [the Trump administration],” to either rescind or revise the rule.

The Trump administration has made its preference for deregulation very clear, which has led to many premature declarations of the rule’s ultimate demise. And while I believe it’s likely the DOL will either abolish or revise the rule in its current form, I can see at least three possible outcomes.

  1. Fiduciary rule is rescinded and business returns to the way it was. It’s very possible that the DOL will determine that the rule is inconsistent with the administration’s policies or that it could adversely affect investors, in which case the DOL could rescind the rule. Retirement advice would continue very much as it did in the past, with financial advisors held to two different standards of care when giving retirement advice: a fiduciary standard (advice giver must place client’s interest above his own interest – the SEC rule which applies to investment advisors) and a suitability standard (advice must be suitable to a client’s objectives, means and age – the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority rule which applies to brokers).
  2. Fiduciary rule is revised and advisors are held to a (likely) lower fiduciary standard. Doing away with the rule is not the only option. The White House memo clearly states that the DOL could recommend to revise the rule. The rule in its current form is the result of lots of compromises and various revisions over time. (Technically it’s a different fiduciary standard from the one that applies to Registered Investment Advisors – although it’s similar). It would likely take a long time, but it’s possible that a revised fiduciary rule could be implemented, albeit in a different form, in the future. In this state of the world, I would expect that changes would tend to dilute rather than strengthen the rule from the individual investor’s perspective, but on the whole would be more investor-protective than the current suitability standard that applies to much retirement advice.
  3. Industry adoption of the fiduciary standard trumps (get it?!) the need for a formal rule. One effect of the fiduciary rule debate over the past few years is that investors have started to take notice and actually care whether their financial advisor is a fiduciary or not. It’s possible that you still don’t know what a fiduciary is, but if you do there’s a high likelihood it’s because you learned about it from news stories about the DOL fiduciary rule. And public opinion matters. As of today, the country’s three largest brokerages, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, and Wells Fargo Advisors, all say they will continue to make changes to their business models to comply with the fiduciary rule regardless of what happens. Under this scenario, the DOL could eliminate the rule and the financial players who had previously lobbied so strongly against the rule in the first place might voluntarily adopt it.

It will be very interesting to see how this story develops over the next few months. Consumer advocates will complain if the rule is abolished. Business leaders will decry it if its implementation moves forward. But one thing seems clear: the times they are a changin’.

 

More articles by Frank Napolitano Filed Under: Investments Tagged With: Legislation

Footer

Services

  • Financial Planning
  • Financial Guidance
  • Portfolio Management

About Us

  • Our Philosophy
  • Team

Resources

  • Blog
    • The Types of People We Help
  • Financial Planning Guidebook
Sign up for our Newsletter

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Locations

Massachusetts

203 Crescent Street, Suite 404

Waltham, MA 02453

Phone: (781) 642-0890
Fax: (781) 810-4830

 

California

600 B Street, Suite 300

San Diego, CA 92101

Phone: (619) 573-4131​

Disclaimer

This content reflects the opinions of Sensible Financial®. We may change it at any time without notice. We provide this content for informational purposes only. Although we endeavor to keep the information up-to-date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability for a particular purpose or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. We do not intend the information contained in this website as investment advice and we do not recommend that you buy or sell any security. We do not guarantee that our statements, opinions or forecasts will prove to be correct. Past performance does not guarantee future results. You cannot invest directly in any index. If you attempt to mimic the performance of an index, you will incur fees and expenses which will reduce returns. All investing involves risk. You can lose any money you invest. There is no guarantee that any investment plan or strategy will succeed.

More important additional information and full disclaimer.

Copyright © 2025 Sensible Financial · All Rights Are Reserved
Legal Disclosure