• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
MENUMENU
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Philosophy
    • Choosing a Financial Planner
    • Legal and Regulatory
    • Team
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Our Services
    • Financial Planning
    • Ongoing Financial Guidance
    • Portfolio Management
  • Financial Planning Basics
    • Continuing Care Retirement Communities (CCRCs)
    • Retirement Planning and Cash Flow
    • Social Security
    • Taxes
    • Insurance & Risk Management
    • Investments
    • 401(k)
    • Real Estate
    • College
    • Liquidity
    • Divorce
    • Estate Planning
    • Sensible Updates
  • Resources
    • The Types of People We Help
    • Webinars
    • Blog
    • Videos
    • Financial Planning Guidebook
    • Continuing Care Retirement Communities Guidebook
    • Primers
    • Financial Planning Links
    • Client Links
    • Financial Planning for Older Adults
  • Contact Us
Sensible Financial Planning

Sensible Financial Planning

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
Client Links

Call Us Today
781-642-0890

Sensible Scenarios: Should I Stay or Should I Go?

by
Laura Williams
CFP®, ChSNC® - Senior Financial Advisor

March 20, 2019

The picture shows an intersection with two choices to represent the career choice the Sanders family must make.

Mike and Bethany Sanders live in the Boston area. He’s an executive with a tech firm, and she stays at home, caring for their three kids. The couple works hard: Mike, during his long hours in the office, and Bethany, running the home and keeping ahead of the schedules of a family of five. While they’re happy and enjoy their active lives, the two dream of an early retirement for Mike and a less hectic life. 

Their biggest questions are whether Mike should stay in his current job and their current house or take a promising position in another state. They want to know whether those decisions will affect their retirement plans and, if so, how much. 

They live in a pricey area and own a $850K home. Mike’s job pays well, but their mortgage and property taxes are high. They have $1.2M in savings and investments. Mike’s present and future earnings represent a significant portion of their lifetime resources. 

Because of the apples vs. oranges nature of comparing the two compensation plans, Mike and Bethany asked a financial advisor to analyze the two prospects to determine their best move. 

Mike and Bethany’s current position/living situation: 

  • Healthy company pension 
  • Small portion of earnings paid through equity compensation 
  • High housing costs/property taxes 

Mike’s new job offer: 

  • Large sign-on bonus 
  • Higher 401(k) match 
  • Larger portion of earnings paid through equity compensation 
  • Lower housing cost 

Comparing Mike’s current job to the new offer was more complex than a simple calculation. The Sanders’ financial advisor considered more than salary. They looked at both companies’ 401(k) plans and his current company’s pension plan, along with salary and how much of that salary depended on company stock performance. They also considered how income, property tax, and housing costs varied between the two states. The Sanders wondered how much money each offer would afford them for extras like vacations, nights out, and other luxuries while keeping them on track for retirement. 

Both positions were in Mike’s chosen field, and both companies were healthy, offering Mike a promising corporate future. Mike reported the offer to his current company, which counter-offered. 

The financial advisor analyzed the two offers and found: 

  • Moving to a new state and job would increase their disposable income, if Mike’s income followed its projected path. 
  • Mike’s earnings at the new company would be largely equity-based and tied to company stock performance. If the new company did well, the Sanders would too, but if not, Mike might not be able to retire early. 
  • Staying in their present home and job would allow Mike to retire early but would not leave much for discretionary spending. They’d have a little extra money though, and the family would not have to move to accomplish their financial and retirement goals. 

The current employer’s compensation offer made his present job look even more attractive. The additional earnings, when measured against the cost of moving, uprooting the family, and the added risk of the new employer’s compensation structure, convinced the couple that Mike should remain in his present job. After Mike and Bethany decided to stay in Massachusetts, their advisor identified how much additional long-term disability insurance Mike would need to cover his increased income. Creating a lifetime balance showed the Sanders the importance of protecting Mike’s future earnings. 

Staying in their home and using Mike’s increased salary enabled the family to improve the function of their home and increase its value. The Sanders family had questions they needed help to answer. Their advisor analyzed the variables and gave them the facts they needed to choose the best method to achieve their financial goals. 

The article listed above summarizes a hypothetical scenario developed to illustrate the kind of people we help and the problems we solve. 

More articles by Laura Williams Filed Under: Insurance & Risk Management Tagged With: Career Choices, retirement planning

Footer

Services

  • Financial Planning
  • Financial Guidance
  • Portfolio Management

About Us

  • Our Philosophy
  • Team

Resources

  • Blog
    • The Types of People We Help
  • Financial Planning Guidebook
Sign up for our Newsletter

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Locations

Massachusetts

203 Crescent Street, Suite 404

Waltham, MA 02453

Phone: (781) 642-0890
Fax: (781) 810-4830

 

California

600 B Street, Suite 300

San Diego, CA 92101

Phone: (619) 573-4131​

Disclaimer

This content reflects the opinions of Sensible Financial®. We may change it at any time without notice. We provide this content for informational purposes only. Although we endeavor to keep the information up-to-date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability for a particular purpose or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. We do not intend the information contained in this website as investment advice and we do not recommend that you buy or sell any security. We do not guarantee that our statements, opinions or forecasts will prove to be correct. Past performance does not guarantee future results. You cannot invest directly in any index. If you attempt to mimic the performance of an index, you will incur fees and expenses which will reduce returns. All investing involves risk. You can lose any money you invest. There is no guarantee that any investment plan or strategy will succeed.

More important additional information and full disclaimer.

Copyright © 2025 Sensible Financial · All Rights Are Reserved
Legal Disclosure